<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PUMS areas? We got &#8216;em.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.justinmassa.com/2010/01/pums-areas-we-got-em/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.justinmassa.com/2010/01/pums-areas-we-got-em/</link>
	<description>maps, open data, housing, civil rights, nerd</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.justinmassa.com/2010/01/pums-areas-we-got-em/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justinmassa.com/?p=346#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ian - that is pretty much exactly what we&#039;re hoping to do, but with MCIC&#039;s incredibly clean data : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ian &#8211; that is pretty much exactly what we&#8217;re hoping to do, but with MCIC&#8217;s incredibly clean data : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bicking</title>
		<link>http://www.justinmassa.com/2010/01/pums-areas-we-got-em/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bicking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justinmassa.com/?p=346#comment-157</guid>
		<description>This might be apropos: http://wiki.open311.org/GeoWeb_DNS -- the idea is a service that returns areas given a point.  I&#039;ve just imported some NYC data into it (at http://wiki.open311.org/GeoWeb_DNS), but it&#039;s a matter of rounding up the appropriate data.

This doesn&#039;t take the place of exports, but it&#039;s more the kind of thing that can be done with exports, and making the results easier for people to use.

The site itself is young, not sure where exactly it&#039;ll go, but it&#039;s open source and I believe fairly easy to work with (an appropriately small codebase).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be apropos: <a href="http://wiki.open311.org/GeoWeb_DNS" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.open311.org/GeoWeb_DNS</a> &#8212; the idea is a service that returns areas given a point.  I&#8217;ve just imported some NYC data into it (at <a href="http://wiki.open311.org/GeoWeb_DNS)" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.open311.org/GeoWeb_DNS)</a>, but it&#8217;s a matter of rounding up the appropriate data.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t take the place of exports, but it&#8217;s more the kind of thing that can be done with exports, and making the results easier for people to use.</p>
<p>The site itself is young, not sure where exactly it&#8217;ll go, but it&#8217;s open source and I believe fairly easy to work with (an appropriately small codebase).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.justinmassa.com/2010/01/pums-areas-we-got-em/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justinmassa.com/?p=346#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Thanks Joe!

The idea is to start with requiring lat/lon as the input but, if there&#039;s demand, I don&#039;t see a reason why the service couldn&#039;t also accept an address and return lat/long + geographies. Good idea on the accuracy; would returning an annotation that &quot;point is near a boundary line for __ geo&quot; + including in the metadata for each boundary set the geocoding success rate be enough? 

On this thread, we&#039;re also thinking about returning overlapping boundaries for a polygon input, but there&#039;s significantly more development involved in that. In the beginning, it will be just points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Joe!</p>
<p>The idea is to start with requiring lat/lon as the input but, if there&#8217;s demand, I don&#8217;t see a reason why the service couldn&#8217;t also accept an address and return lat/long + geographies. Good idea on the accuracy; would returning an annotation that &#8220;point is near a boundary line for __ geo&#8221; + including in the metadata for each boundary set the geocoding success rate be enough? </p>
<p>On this thread, we&#8217;re also thinking about returning overlapping boundaries for a polygon input, but there&#8217;s significantly more development involved in that. In the beginning, it will be just points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Germuska</title>
		<link>http://www.justinmassa.com/2010/01/pums-areas-we-got-em/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Germuska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 20:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.justinmassa.com/?p=346#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Format: presumably GeoJSON is the most useful/flexible.  Maybe also KML?

Additional information: if the input is anything other than a lat/lon pair, then you need to give feedback on how the input string was geocoded, hopefully how accurate the geocoding is considered, and possibly a list of alternative possible answers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Format: presumably GeoJSON is the most useful/flexible.  Maybe also KML?</p>
<p>Additional information: if the input is anything other than a lat/lon pair, then you need to give feedback on how the input string was geocoded, hopefully how accurate the geocoding is considered, and possibly a list of alternative possible answers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
